
Trying to understand difficulty rankings (of « difficult » hikes)
So I would say that I am somewhat of a novice hiker but I enjoy pushing myself when travelling so I've tried a few notable hikes/peaks. When trying to assess where these would be rated (and therefore figuring out what's another reasonable "next" challenge that won't be too crazy) however I always find myself scratching my head. For instance, on "Fatmap" I saw one of the trails I did (Wasson Peak in Arizona) listed as "Difficult" hiking, and on the same site I see Longs Peak (CO) listed as "Moderate" alpine climbing… I see many things that proclaim Longs as one of the most difficult day hikes possible so I just scratch my head at how something else would call it moderate– is it being compared against multi day expeditions? For my purposes I'm only doing day hikes right now, so it's just tough to get a rough idea of how something new would compare to what I've done (obviously too, different parts of the country probably have different barometers- what's "difficult" in the southeast may not be if that same trail was in the west). As another example, Precipice in Acadia had so many warnings I saw about it, I was too worried to even attempt it my first visit to the park so I only did the Beehive… That was cake, so ended up doing Precipice when we returned a couple years later and it ended up being nowhere close to other trails which had significantly less words of caution. Part of this I feel is due to the distance factor– distance seems to be the biggest determiner at least for me in terms of how difficult something will be (i.e. a 3 mile Precipice will be easier than anything with even a slight incline that is 6+ miles long)
I've put together a list of notable things I've done below:
Tier 1:
Longs Peak
Half Dome
Multi-peak White Mountains in the winter
(Out of these 3, I would put them neck and neck in terms of difficulty to me. Though based on the definitions I've seen, Longs would be the only one that's considered "Class 3" by virtue of the other 2 not requiring hands on rocks?… Seems a bit arbitrary as the other two were just as hard in my book)
Tier 2:
White Mountains in the summer
(This is tough for me to judge since I know there's variations in the trails and it's not like I did the same trail months apart on the different seasons to figure out the difference in difficulty)
Mount Pico (Azores / Portugal)
-Huge dropoff to Tier 3-
Tougher trails in Acadia (Cadillac, Precipice, etc)
Wasson Peak in Arizona
One of the next trails I'm eyeing is Old Rag in Shenandoah.. at first blush I'd put that in the Tier 2 category of my list, but I'm pretty much solely basing that on distance. Are there any other notable trails that would fall into my Tier 1/Tier 2? Or is there an easy way to draw the lines to differentiate these different hikes? I'm figuring above my Tier 1 is legit rock climbing with special equipment and/or multi day "expeditions".. I've tried guided rock climbing before but that is about the furthest I intend to take that
If there's anything in my rambling that sounds off or can be explained differently, let me know! I'm starting to get more into hiking and I'm trying not to sound like too much of a noob when I open my mouth!